Monolothic is not modern.
Limitations of UI Legacy benefit systems are well known. Their technology is old, their architecture is monolithic, sky rocketing maintenance cost, and even higher cost to add new functionality.
In the early 2000's many states began modernizing their systems. Unfortunately the early systems that were created during initial state modernizations, we're not cutting edge in their architecture. Most states basically got the same system, if not an inferior one, and the only thing that was modern about it was getting off their mainframes.
The implementations of these monolithic systems were a grueling 2 to 3 years in timeframes and schedule and cost overruns were the norm. The implementations also required a significant amount of work to already overworked state SWA staffing. The results for many states were high turnover rates due to the demands put on state workforce agency staff.


Monolothic is not modern.
Limitations of UI Legacy benefit systems are well known. Their technology is old, their architecture is monolithic, sky rocketing maintenance cost, and even higher cost to add new functionality.
In the early 2000's many states began modernizing their systems. Unfortunately the early systems that were created during initial state modernizations, we're not cutting edge in their architecture. Most states basically got the same system, if not an inferior one, and the only thing that was modern about it was getting off their mainframes.
The implementations of these monolithic systems were a grueling 2 to 3 years in timeframes and schedule and cost overruns were the norm. The implementations also required a significant amount of work to already overworked state SWA staffing. The results for many states were high turnover rates due to the demands put on state workforce agency staff.

States Must Avoid Monolithic Modernizations.
